E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial: The Films and Books Hidden in Elliott’s House
Spielberg filled a suburban house with other people’s stories. This guide identifies them and explains what each one is doing in a film about a lost child.
Introduction
The references in E.T. are domestic. They are toys on a carpet, a film playing on a television nobody is watching, a book read at bedtime. None of them announces itself, and all of them are doing work.
That quietness is the reason the film rewards a details guide. A viewer can watch it a dozen times and register the Halloween sequence without noticing that one costume produces a reaction from the creature, or hear a bedtime story without noticing that it states the film’s thesis out loud.
This guide takes the identifiable references, places them, and marks which have been confirmed by the production. Spielberg has discussed several of them directly, and one of the film’s most talked-about connections turns out to involve a scene that was filmed and then cut.
Spoiler warning
This guide discusses mid-film revelations and some plot turns. It discusses the film’s final act and how the story resolves. The detail-by-detail section below stays hidden until you choose to open it.
Film context
The film grew out of a period in which Spielberg had been developing a much darker project about a hostile visitation, and it was written quickly by Melissa Mathison during the production of Raiders of the Lost Ark. The tonal shift is complete: the earlier idea became a different film years later, and this one became a story about divorce, loneliness, and a child’s bedroom.
It was shot largely in sequence, unusually for a studio production, so that the young cast’s performances could develop alongside the story. Much of it takes place inside a single suburban house, built as a set for the interiors and matched with location work in California.
The creature was a physical build overseen by Carlo Rambaldi, operated by several performers depending on the shot. Because the character is a practical object in the room, the set dressing around it matters more than usual: everything the creature touches is a real prop that a real puppet had to interact with.
The film opened in June 1982 and became the highest grossing release of its era. Its cultural saturation is relevant here, because several of its references were made when the sources were current and are now historical curiosities requiring explanation.
The details, one by one
Each entry below carries an approximate on-screen time and a label marking whether the detail has been confirmed by the people who made the film or remains an informed reading. Running times vary between theatrical cuts, home releases, and restorations, so treat every timestamp as a signpost rather than a precise measurement.
It discusses the film’s final act and how the story resolves. Open this section when you are ready to read the details in full.
Times refer to the original theatrical version, which runs about 115 minutes.
Elliott’s bedroom floor is covered in Star Wars figures
When Elliott introduces the creature to his possessions, he presents a collection of action figures from Star Wars, naming several. The toys are the real products, licensed for use, and the sequence is one of the most prominent placements of another studio’s characters in a major film of the period.
It was an exchange rather than a coincidence. George Lucas and Spielberg had a long-running practice of citing each other’s work, and the reference here was reciprocated when a group of creatures resembling this film’s protagonist appeared among the delegates in the senate chamber of Star Wars: Episode I seventeen years later.
For a details guide the interesting part is what the toys accomplish narratively. They establish that the boy explains the universe through the fiction he consumes, which is exactly how he will later explain the creature to himself.
On the record: The toys are identifiable in the film and the reciprocal appearance in Episode I has been confirmed by Lucasfilm; the mutual references have been discussed by both directors in interviews.
A John Ford film plays on television during the classroom scene
While Elliott sits in a school biology class, the creature is at home watching television, and what it watches is The Quiet Man, John Ford’s 1952 romance. The film reaches its most famous embrace, and Elliott, connected to the creature’s emotional state, kisses a classmate.
The construction is precise. The borrowed film supplies the impulse, the sequence cuts between the two locations, and no dialogue explains the mechanism. It is one of the cleverest uses of a film-within-a-film in American cinema of the period.
Spielberg has spoken about Ford’s work as foundational, and the choice of that particular scene is deliberate rather than incidental. The rights were cleared for the excerpt, which is itself evidence of planning.
On the record: The excerpt is credited in the film and the choice has been discussed by Spielberg in interviews about Ford’s influence on his work, including his American Film Institute appearances.
The creature recognizes a costume at Halloween
During the Halloween sequence, the creature, disguised under a sheet, passes a child dressed as Yoda and attempts to follow, producing a sound of recognition. It is a two-second joke that depends entirely on the audience having seen a film released two years earlier.
The gag has a second layer. Both characters were designed as physical creature effects, and the puppet in the sheet reacting to a costume of another puppet is a joke about the craft that made them as much as about the fiction.
This is the reference that most clearly demonstrates the exchange between the two productions, and it was cleared and staged deliberately rather than improvised on the day.
On the record: The costume appears in the finished film with licensing in place, and the reciprocal relationship between the two productions is documented in interviews with both filmmakers.
The bedtime story states the film’s argument
The mother reads to her youngest child from J. M. Barrie’s Peter Pan, and the passage concerns believing in fairies in order to keep one alive. In the next room, the creature is listening, and the film’s final act will turn on very nearly that proposition.
Using a canonical children’s text to declare a theme is a risk, and the scene manages it by keeping the reading in the background of a domestic moment rather than staging it as a revelation. Most first-time viewers register the warmth and miss the thesis.
The choice of Barrie is not arbitrary. The story of a child who will not grow up, visited by something from outside, sits directly underneath this screenplay, and Mathison’s script uses the connection without ever pointing at it.
On the record: The passage is read aloud in the film from Barrie’s text; the thematic use has been discussed in published analysis of Melissa Mathison’s screenplay and in interviews with Spielberg.
The communication device is a real toy
The apparatus assembled to send a signal is built around a genuine children’s spelling toy that was widely sold at the time, combined with an umbrella, a record player, and a circular saw blade. Every component was an object an American child of 1982 could plausibly have found at home.
That grounding is what makes the sequence persuasive. The film never explains how the device works, and it does not need to, because the audience recognizes each part and accepts the assembly as a child’s logic rather than as engineering.
The toy also dates the film precisely. It was a recognizable consumer product with a specific voice, and viewers who never owned one hear the sequence differently than those who did.
On the record: The components are identifiable on screen, and the production’s use of contemporary consumer products is documented in the film’s making-of material.
A scene with a familiar actor was filmed and removed
A sequence was shot in which Elliott is reprimanded by his school principal, played by Harrison Ford, whose face is never shown. Spielberg removed it before release, and it circulated afterward in documentary material and archival releases.
The reason it belongs in a reference guide is that its removal is instructive. The joke depended on recognizing a voice and a silhouette, and Spielberg judged that the recognition would pull the audience out of a film that depends on the adult world being generic and faceless.
It is a rare documented case of a reference being cut for interfering with a film’s design rather than for legal or budgetary reasons.
On the record: The deleted sequence is included in archival material accompanying the film’s later releases, and Spielberg has discussed the decision to remove it.
Connections to other films
The exchange with Lucasfilm is the most concrete link, running in both directions across two decades. Spielberg’s films of the period are full of similar reciprocal gestures with the filmmakers in his immediate circle, and reading them as a group is more informative than treating each as an isolated joke.
John Ford is the deeper connection. Spielberg has repeatedly cited Ford’s framing of doorways and horizons, and the compositions in this film that place small figures against enormous skies belong to that inheritance. The television excerpt is an acknowledgment placed inside the work.
The film also sits alongside Spielberg’s Close Encounters of the Third Kind as a pair of arguments about visitation from opposite directions: one about an adult abandoning his family to follow wonder, the other about a child protecting it. Watching them together makes the references in both easier to read.
Cultural references explained
The suburban geography the film depends on, with its cul-de-sacs, unfenced backyards, and a forest at the end of the development, is specific to postwar American housing patterns. The bicycle chase only makes sense in a landscape built for cars and inhabited by children who had learned to move through it on two wheels.
Barrie’s Peter Pan arrives in the film with almost a century of accumulated meaning, including a stage tradition in which the audience is invited to participate directly in keeping a character alive. That participatory element is exactly what the film’s final act asks of its own viewers.
The confectionery that lures the creature was a real product whose sales rose sharply after release, one of the most cited cases of product placement in film history. It is worth noting that the more famous brand had declined the opportunity, a piece of trivia that has been confirmed by executives at both companies.
Confirmed facts and interpretation
The references in this film are unusually well documented because most of them required licensing. Toys, film excerpts, costumes, and consumer products all leave a paper trail, which makes the confirmed column reliable.
The readings that go beyond the record generally concern religious symbolism in the final act. Those readings are longstanding and often thoughtful, but Spielberg and Mathison have consistently declined to endorse them, and this guide does not treat them as intended meaning.
On the record
- Licensed Star Wars action figures appear in Elliott’s bedroom, and the reference was reciprocated in Star Wars: Episode I.
- The television excerpt during the classroom sequence is from John Ford’s The Quiet Man (1952).
- A child dressed as Yoda appears in the Halloween sequence and prompts a reaction from the creature.
- The passage read aloud is from J. M. Barrie’s Peter Pan.
- A sequence featuring Harrison Ford as a school principal was filmed and cut before release.
Interpretation, not fact
- That the final act was constructed as a deliberate religious allegory.
- That the creature’s design references specific earlier screen aliens.
- That background items in the family home encode additional film references beyond those listed here.
Sources consulted
The material below informed this guide. Where a claim rests on a single account, the guide says so in the relevant entry.
- E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial archival releases and accompanying documentariesUniversal Pictures. Includes the deleted principal sequence and interviews on the creature build and set construction.
- Interviews with Steven Spielberg on John FordAmerican Film Institute. Source for the acknowledged influence and for the choice of the television excerpt.
- Peter Pan, by J. M. BarrieHodder and Stoughton. Consulted for the text read aloud in the film and for its participatory stage tradition.
- Contemporary reporting on the film’s product placement, 1982–1983The Wall Street Journal, Advertising Age. Documents the confectionery placement and the competing brand’s refusal.
- Lucasfilm statements on the Episode I senate-chamber appearanceLucasfilm. Confirms the reciprocal reference between the two productions.
Spotted an error or have a documented source we should add? Write to [email protected] and read our corrections policy.
